Art-Lloyd Metal Products Corp. v. Kaufman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Art-Lloyd Metal Products Corp. v. Kaufman

68 A.D.2d 875, 413 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11104

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 5, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 68 A.D.2d 875 (Art-Lloyd Metal Products Corp. v. Kaufman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Art-Lloyd Metal Products Corp. v. Kaufman, 68 A.D.2d 875, 413 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11104 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

In consolidated actions, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud (Action No. 1) and for breach of contract (Action No. 2), the appeals are from so much of an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered August 31, 1977, as (1) dismissed the complaint in Action No. 2, (2) dismissed most causes of action in Action No. 1 and (3) determined that a certain down payment belonged to Allied Equimet Corporation. Interlocutory judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The record unequivocally establishes that the trial court’s conclusion, that neither party had established its case by a preponderance of the credible evidence, is correct. Titone, J. P., Suozzi, Gulotta and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In consolidated actions, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud (Action No. 1) and for breach of contract (Action No. 2), the appeals are from so much of an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered August 31, 1977, as (1) dismissed the complaint in Action No. 2, (2) dismissed most causes of action in Action No. 1 and (3) determined that a certain down payment belonged to Allied Equimet Corporation. Interlocutory judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The record unequivocally establishes that the trial court’s conclusion, that neither party had established its case by a preponderance of the credible evidence, is correct. Titone, J. P., Suozzi, Gulotta and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 A.D.2d 875, 413 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/art-lloyd-metal-products-corp-v-kaufman-nyappdiv-1979.