Arserio v. Arserio

13 Conn. Supp. 146, 1944 Conn. Super. LEXIS 94
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Arserio v. Arserio. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 Conn. Super. Ct. 146
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided December 13, 1944·No. File No. 55477·Published

Opinion

QUINLAN J.

There was personal service. Alimony was claimed. No order of alimony was made. One of the children for whom support was provided is now married. The boy is 17 and earning good compensation. He is emancipated and is paying his mother a weekly sum. Reasonable grounds in the way of changed circumstances warrant a termination of the order of support and it is hereby so ordered.

The suggestion that alimony be now awarded to the wife seems to be adversely answered by the statute itself (Gen. Stat. [1930J §5182) wherein it is provided that “any order.... may, at any time thereafter, be set aside or altered. Akin to the decision in Semple vs. Semple, 3 Conn. Sup. 351 (Inglis, J.) if there was no order, as here, “there is no order” to be set aside or altered. Any claim for alimony at this time is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arserio v. Arserio, 13 Conn. Supp. 146, 1944 Conn. Super. LEXIS 94 (Colo. Ct. App. 1944).

13 Conn. Supp. 146 (Arserio v. Arserio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Semple v. Semple
3 Conn. Super. Ct. 351 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1936)