Arseneau v. Zucker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Arseneau v. Zucker

126 A.D.3d 1393, 3 N.Y.S.3d 695

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 20, 2015

StatusPublished

This text of 126 A.D.3d 1393 (Arseneau v. Zucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arseneau v. Zucker, 126 A.D.3d 1393, 3 N.Y.S.3d 695 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County [Anthony J. Paris, J.], entered Sept. 9, 2014) to review a determination of respondent New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance. The determination, among other things, adjudged that petitioner was not eligible under Medical Assistance for coverage of her nursing home expenses because she transferred assets for less than the fair market value.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on February 3 and 6, 2015,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Present — Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County [Anthony J. Paris, J.], entered Sept. 9, 2014) to review a determination of respondent New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance. The determination, among other things, adjudged that petitioner was not eligible under Medical Assistance for coverage of her nursing home expenses because she transferred assets for less than the fair market value.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on February 3 and 6, 2015,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Present — Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 A.D.3d 1393, 3 N.Y.S.3d 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arseneau-v-zucker-nyappdiv-2015.