Arseneau v. Arseneau

Missouri Court of Appeals

Arseneau v. Arseneau

477 S.W.3d 709, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1286, 2015 WL 8922292

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 15, 2015

DocketED 102612

StatusPublished

This text of 477 S.W.3d 709 (Arseneau v. Arseneau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arseneau v. Arseneau, 477 S.W.3d 709, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1286, 2015 WL 8922292 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Devon Arseneau (“Mother”) appeals from the circuit court’s Judgment of Contempt, finding Mother in contempt of court for her refusal to comply with the court’s order of November 20, 2013, which dissolved her marriage with Joshua Arseneau (“Father”) and, inter alia, awarded custody and support for the parties’ minor child. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential' purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Devon Arseneau (“Mother”) appeals from the circuit court’s Judgment of Contempt, finding Mother in contempt of court for her refusal to comply with the court’s order of November 20, 2013, which dissolved her marriage with Joshua Arseneau (“Father”) and, inter alia, awarded custody and support for the parties’ minor child. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential' purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

477 S.W.3d 709, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1286, 2015 WL 8922292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arseneau-v-arseneau-moctapp-2015.