Arroyo v. Life Science Innovations

828 N.W.2d 732, 2013 WL 1487917, 2013 Minn. LEXIS 188
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedApril 2, 2013
DocketNo. A12-1397
StatusPublished

This text of 828 N.W.2d 732 (Arroyo v. Life Science Innovations) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arroyo v. Life Science Innovations, 828 N.W.2d 732, 2013 WL 1487917, 2013 Minn. LEXIS 188 (Mich. 2013).

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on July 12, 2012, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prec-edential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/-

Christopher J. Dietzen Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
828 N.W.2d 732, 2013 WL 1487917, 2013 Minn. LEXIS 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arroyo-v-life-science-innovations-minn-2013.