Arroyo v. Life Science Innovations

828 N.W.2d 732, 2013 WL 1487917, 2013 Minn. LEXIS 188
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided April 2, 2013·No. No. A12-1397·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on July 12, 2012, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prec-edential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/-

Christopher J. Dietzen Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arroyo v. Life Science Innovations, 828 N.W.2d 732, 2013 WL 1487917, 2013 Minn. LEXIS 188 (Mich. 2013).

828 N.W.2d 732 (Arroyo v. Life Science Innovations) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)