Arroyo v. Kizakazi

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BETZAIDA ARROYO, : Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : KILOLO KIJAKAZI, : NO. 21-cv-05087-RAL Commissioner of Social Security, : O R D E R AND NOW this 23rd day of August, 2022, upon consideration of the parties’ submissions, it is ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 1) and Brief and Statement of Issues (Doc. No. 6) is DENIED, consistent with the Memorandum Opinion filed contemporaneously with this Order; 2. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED by separate document, filed contemporaneously. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 303 (1993); Kadelski v. Sullivan, 30 F.3d 399, 402 (3d Cir. 1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a). 3. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for all purposes including statistics.

_s/ Richard A. Lloret ________ HON. RICHARD A. LLORET United States Magistrate Judge