Arroyo v. Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc.
This text of 16 A.D.2d 635 (Arroyo v. Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment for defendants entered on jury verdict in favor of defendants and order denying a motion for a new trial unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondents. While the court charged the jury correctly in regard to the effect to be given to the testimony of the medical [636]*636panel expert, the court went further in elaborating on the findings of the doctor than the circumstances warranted. We find, however, that in. this case any error in this regard was not so substantial, in the light of the evidence, as to have affected the jury’s findings. Concur — Breitel, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 A.D.2d 635, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arroyo-v-fifth-avenue-coach-lines-inc-nyappdiv-1962.