Arroyo v. City of New York

185 A.D.2d 829
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 10, 1992·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), entered June 12, 1990, which permitted the defendants to withdraw their jury demand on the eve of trial and barred the plaintiffs from filing a jury demand on the eve of trial.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The order appealed from did not decide a motion made on notice, and hence, is not appealable as of right (CPLR 5701 [a] [2]; see, Cohalan v Johnson Elec. Constr. Corp., 105 AD2d 770). The appellants perfected the appeal without leave to appeal (see, Roberts v Modica, 102 AD2d 886). In light of this disposition, we do not pass on the merits of the arguments raised by the appellants. Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Balletta and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arroyo v. City of New York, 185 A.D.2d 829 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

185 A.D.2d 829 (Arroyo v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sanford Equities Corp. v. Cushing
2024 NY Slip Op 50200(U) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Fulton View Realty, LLC v. Reddy
161 N.Y.S.3d 688 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Braun v. Cesareo
2019 NY Slip Op 1962 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)