Arroll v. Buffalo, Lockport & Rochester Railway Co.
This text of 164 A.D. 970 (Arroll v. Buffalo, Lockport & Rochester Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Robson and Merrell, JJ., who dissented upon the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence, and upon the further ground that the court committed reversible error in permitting the plaintiff to testify under defendant’s objection that the defendant’s claim agent, Hoenig, called upon him after the accident.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
164 A.D. 970, 149 N.Y.S. 1069, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arroll-v-buffalo-lockport-rochester-railway-co-nyappdiv-1914.