Arrington's administrator v. Coleman
This text of 3 N.C. 300 (Arrington's administrator v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ftTHEN the trial came on, the plaintiff was about to read two * ” depositions of one Philips and his wife, which were essential in the cause, and it ivas objected that Philips, the witness, was a surety for the costs of the suit; whereupon his testimony was rejected. The plaintiff moved fora new trial, on the ground of surprize ; and M-Cay, judge, rejected .his motion without hesitation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 N.C. 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arringtons-administrator-v-coleman-ncsuperct-1804.