Arrington v. Suncrest Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Arrington v. Suncrest Lumber Co.

196 N.C. 821

DecidedJanuary 9, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 196 N.C. 821 (Arrington v. Suncrest Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arrington v. Suncrest Lumber Co., 196 N.C. 821 (N.C. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

PeR CuriaM.

Tbe right of tbe plaintiff to recover for injuries sustained, under circumstances such as those disclosed by tbe present record, is fully discussed in Cook v. Mfg. Co., 182 N. C., 205, 108 S. E., 730, and 183 N. C., 48, 110 S. E., 608.

Tbe case was properly submitted to tbe jury, and we have found no error on tbe record, save a discrepancy between tbe verdiet and tbe judgment as to tbe answer of tbe second issue, but wbicb is not deemed fatal to tbe validity of tbe trial.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PeR CuriaM.

Tbe right of tbe plaintiff to recover for injuries sustained, under circumstances such as those disclosed by tbe present record, is fully discussed in Cook v. Mfg. Co., 182 N. C., 205, 108 S. E., 730, and 183 N. C., 48, 110 S. E., 608.

Tbe case was properly submitted to tbe jury, and we have found no error on tbe record, save a discrepancy between tbe verdiet and tbe judgment as to tbe answer of tbe second issue, but wbicb is not deemed fatal to tbe validity of tbe trial.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 N.C. 821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arrington-v-suncrest-lumber-co-nc-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack