Arrington v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Arrington v. State

296 S.W. 568, 107 Tex. Crim. 422, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 456

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 27, 1927

DocketNo. 10873.

StatusPublished

This text of 296 S.W. 568 (Arrington v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arrington v. State, 296 S.W. 568, 107 Tex. Crim. 422, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 456 (Tex. 1927).

Pincite

Opinions

MORROW, Presiding Judge. —

The offense is swindling by giving a check with intent to defraud, as denounced by Art. 1546, subd. 4, P. C. 1925, punishment fixed at a fine of five dollars.

The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. No complaint of the procedure is made by way of bills of exceptions. We have been furnished with no brief pointing out any reason for a reversal of the judgment, and we have perceived none.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge. —

The offense is swindling by giving a check with intent to defraud, as denounced by Art. 1546, subd. 4, P. C. 1925, punishment fixed at a fine of five dollars.

The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. No complaint of the procedure is made by way of bills of exceptions. We have been furnished with no brief pointing out any reason for a reversal of the judgment, and we have perceived none.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

296 S.W. 568, 107 Tex. Crim. 422, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arrington-v-state-texcrimapp-1927.