Arrington v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Arrington v. State

765 S.W.2d 735, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 318, 1989 WL 21760

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 7, 1989

DocketNo. 55123

StatusPublished

This text of 765 S.W.2d 735 (Arrington v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arrington v. State, 765 S.W.2d 735, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 318, 1989 WL 21760 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant was convicted by a jury of first degree robbery and sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment. The conviction was affirmed in State v. Arrington, 721 S.W.2d 94 (Mo.App.1987). Movant sought to vacate his conviction on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel, but his motion was denied following an evidentiary hearing.

We find the motion court’s judgment was based on findings of fact not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value.

Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI