Arrington v. Robertson

119 F.2d 1022, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3913

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is the second appeal in this litigation to this court. See Arrington v. Robertson, 3 Cir., 1940, 114 F.2d 821. We have examined the testimony herein fully and conclude that no substantial question is involved in this appeal and that we should not be justified in filling the space involved in printing the demonstration of that fact.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.