Arrington v. Mobile & Ohio Rail Road

30 Miss. 470
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1855
StatusPublished

This text of 30 Miss. 470 (Arrington v. Mobile & Ohio Rail Road) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arrington v. Mobile & Ohio Rail Road, 30 Miss. 470 (Mich. 1855).

Opinion

Fisher, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The court below entered a judgment final, by default, against the defendant. The action is not founded upon an instrument of writing, ascertaining the sum due; at least none such is declared on, by the plaintiffs.

The statute is as follows, on this subject: “All judgments on demurrer, confession non sum informatus, nil dicit, or by default, in actions of debt, for a sum certain, and in actions founded on any instrument of writing, ascertaining the sum due,” &c., “shall be final on the last day of the term,” &c. Hutch Code, 875.

Under this provision of the statute, a judgment final could not be rendered on the contract, as set out in the complaint.

Judgment reversed, judgment by default, with writ of inquiry, and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Miss. 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arrington-v-mobile-ohio-rail-road-miss-1855.