Arrington v. Lomenzo

51 A.D.2d 743, 379 N.Y.S.2d 477, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11264
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 9, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 51 A.D.2d 743 (Arrington v. Lomenzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arrington v. Lomenzo, 51 A.D.2d 743, 379 N.Y.S.2d 477, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11264 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Acting Secretary of State of the State of New York, dated February 18, 1974, which, after a hearing, and upon a finding that petitioner had demonstrated untrustworthiness, (1) revoked his real estate broker’s license and (2) conditioned any future application for such a license upon proof that petitioner had applied a certain broker’s commission to the reduction of a certain mortgage debt. Determination annulled, on the law, with costs, and charge dismissed. The record is totally devoid of any credible proof to substantiate the charge that petitioner demonstrated untrustworthiness in violation of section 441-c of the Real Property Law. The misstatement of income by the purchaser was contrived by him without any complicity therein by the petitioner. Nor was petitioner responsible for the employer’s failure to transmit the verification of employment form directly to the prospective mortgagee, since petitioner had nothing to do with it. As to the indemnity provision, there is no proof that the mortgagee or the Federal Housing Administration suffered any damage, or made any claim for same; nor is it apparent how or why a payment could or should be made to reduce a mortgage which has already been foreclosed. Gulotta, P. J., Latham, Margett, Damiani and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Realty World/Realty World Franchise Service Corp. v. Shaffer
101 A.D.2d 708 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Madison Valencia Group, Inc. v. Cuomo
57 A.D.2d 896 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 A.D.2d 743, 379 N.Y.S.2d 477, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arrington-v-lomenzo-nyappdiv-1976.