Arrington v. Jenkins

188 F. App'x 971
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJuly 12, 2006
DocketNo. 06-11281
StatusPublished

This text of 188 F. App'x 971 (Arrington v. Jenkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arrington v. Jenkins, 188 F. App'x 971 (11th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

One of the defendants, Charles Clifton, appeals the order of the district court denying him qualified immunity. The trial judge found that the facts are not, at this stage, undisputed.

We have reviewed the briefs, record and the order of the district judge. We agree that questions of fact, hotly disputed, prevent grant of qualified immunity.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 F. App'x 971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arrington-v-jenkins-ca11-2006.