Arrington v. Cocklin

Fourth Circuit

Arrington v. Cocklin

116 F. App'x 468

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 7, 2004·No. No. 04-1674·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Charlene Arrington appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for the Defendants on her racial discrimination and retaliation action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Arrington v. Cocklin, No. CA-02-655-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Charlene Arrington appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for the Defendants on her racial discrimination and retaliation action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Arrington v. Cocklin, No. CA-02-655-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Arrington v. Cocklin, 116 F. App'x 468 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

116 F. App'x 468 (Arrington v. Cocklin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.