Arrington v. . Arrington

Superior Court of North Carolina

Arrington v. . Arrington

2 N.C. 1

Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided October 5, 1789·Published

Opinion

ruled that delivery of possession in such cases is principally in order to identify the property, and that it might also answer the purposes of notoriety; but when the identity of them could be proven, the gift was good without delivery. Verdict for the plaintiff accordingly. If there had been two boys of the same name, a delivery might have been necessary; but as there was only one, the proof of identity was easy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ruled that delivery of possession in such cases is principally in order to identify the property, and that it might also answer the purposes of notoriety; but when the identity of them could be proven, the gift was good without delivery. Verdict for the plaintiff accordingly. If there had been two boys of the same name, a delivery might have been necessary; but as there was only one, the proof of identity was easy.

Arrington v. . Arrington, 2 N.C. 1 (N.C. Ct. App. 1789).

Pincite

2 N.C. 1 (Arrington v. . Arrington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.