Arrington v. Arrington.

55 S.E. 1047, 142 N.C. 130, 1906 N.C. LEXIS 228
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 25, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 55 S.E. 1047 (Arrington v. Arrington.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arrington v. Arrington., 55 S.E. 1047, 142 N.C. 130, 1906 N.C. LEXIS 228 (N.C. 1906).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We gather from tbe manuscript argument filed in tbis Court by tbe plaintiff, in person, tbat ber object in desiring a reinstatement of tbe cause is to reopen tbe same and bave another reference. Tbe case came before tbis Court at February Term, 1894 (114 N. 0., 151), and upon exceptions to tbe report of tbe referee. In an elaborate opinion by Shepherd, O. J., all tbe matters in controversy were decided and “tbe case remanded in order tbat judgments may be entered in accordance with the opinion of tbis Court.” The' record of tbe ease since then is not before us, but we assume as a matter of course tbat such final judgments bave long since been entered.

There was nothing presented to Judge Ward, or in tbe papers sent here on tbis appeal from bis order, which discloses a necessity for a further reference or for reinstating tbe case on tbe docket of the Superior Court. Tbe order of bis Honor in tbe Superior Court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arrington v. . Arrington
19 S.E. 351 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 S.E. 1047, 142 N.C. 130, 1906 N.C. LEXIS 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arrington-v-arrington-nc-1906.