Arrington, Maurice Samuel v. State
Opinion
_^t_ ^o4t^xN-^t-^aas-^^— r—FlbEO-IN—
MAR 26 2015 CCXJRT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS &c^a,G^^ MAR 26 2015 _^^,<»6_\\^<\-t——_—.—AbelAG08tarGlerk-
~ "MAR2 6 2015"
c-THIRDeOUW-OFAPPEALSy
\ JEFFREY D.KYLE /
-MOTJOM FO* ^7C^N5to>l-O^XlM£-T^^ILt-AeflU-AMXS .JL-IT
To..m_^aM6Lfc~:To£^
hod t<$f£c^i».u„(muei-_^
_^!>e. .GjlAuUtO a_'__ !_ •• ' • ^ . . '• x« •• - •
-35^ CojoVm Teias of -We offense. oP pos^e^»o^ iO*V\ -Vv>e J»<\Ve*sv_Vo__dk\»oer_ CocaWii i* Cau.S'e No» (oS IS ? SW\<<A
j^vx<^cvc\N Coy<V; ~\W CASe v>»as ftf-ftr**^, o<» ffWxvN 5^ ^o \ ST
:£•
_l3V Jgl<*fog+cAgfta\><><. fof £yV>oO) .PfcTXTlojj Vcfe
_;^Ty>*; ^>-eV>.K'oo€.»r Nooaf not revuesved op €iNenSyoo orCor Vo -•*•— • -- — —1> •—:— <•'—T7-:* •—:— •»..-;—^-fc,.w—_———.*-—* ,—J—:—^.w- • • t. i . ,' i , ;> ,-• •
~7X
lUn*iI or)°sf c> JO,. aojS,. bn _+*v*<W;V-. «^.^p»<^UA.^v«f«.JyvsV. I % • ; v"" < ^T-f- "7 '/"'/;•*."—v"v—'''"'"* "•'".'" —••'•••••; • '•'••;".—^-^M-H1-1 :-*—•'-**; •'-••, • ;• • • ;*• .r-.-—-Jw
.£«*&&cr«wVe~ o-t—$e<-v<-I&Zr
f X CerKf«-v JrV\©»V Ov Wat ©,<><* Co<«f ec¥ -Cof«* - o4* Wt above*' ^OtfxcK. .(occ^o'^«k--CU.S*—HOXIokl— £o<~fe^e^^^^^^^e—Vx.™-—
Xoyi JWs~4-*»c-Al--cJUv.—of—pn€K<"0«—to 1S1,——'••• ,. •———
^^T^CUC^e^-^)-^^^-
_^t^2<Z._ol^^ . ...... • T-b a ^ ^33 MS H -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arrington, Maurice Samuel v. State (Arrington, Maurice Samuel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.