Arrendale v. Arrendale

388 So. 2d 1348, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17796
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 14, 1980
DocketNo. 80-371
StatusPublished

This text of 388 So. 2d 1348 (Arrendale v. Arrendale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arrendale v. Arrendale, 388 So. 2d 1348, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17796 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a post-judgment order which required the appellant (husband) to pay his former wife the wholesale value of an automobile. The original property settlement agreement, which was incorporated into the final judgment of dissolution, required the husband to transfer title of the automobile to his wife. The trial court therefore had no jurisdiction to modify the original agreement which constituted a settlement of property rights between the parties. Rubio v. Rubio, 347 So.2d 1093 (Fla.2d DCA 1977); Horton v. Horton, 330 So.2d 69 (Fla.1st DCA 1976).

The post-judgment order is therefore reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rubio v. Rubio
347 So. 2d 1093 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Horton v. Horton
330 So. 2d 69 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
388 So. 2d 1348, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arrendale-v-arrendale-fladistctapp-1980.