Arrendal v. Trizechahn Corp.
988 N.E.2d 517, 21 N.Y.3d 894, 965 N.Y.S.2d 781, 2013 NY Slip Op 71629, 2013 WL 1760783, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 794
This text of 988 N.E.2d 517 (Arrendal v. Trizechahn Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Arrendal v. Trizechahn Corp., 988 N.E.2d 517, 21 N.Y.3d 894, 965 N.Y.S.2d 781, 2013 NY Slip Op 71629, 2013 WL 1760783, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 794 (N.Y. 2013).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
988 N.E.2d 517, 21 N.Y.3d 894, 965 N.Y.S.2d 781, 2013 NY Slip Op 71629, 2013 WL 1760783, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arrendal-v-trizechahn-corp-ny-2013.