Arrand v. Commissioner of Social Security
This text of Arrand v. Commissioner of Social Security (Arrand v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
LOUIS SCHNEIDER, ESQ. 1 Nevada Bar No. 9683 430 South 7th Street 2 Las Vegas, NV 89101 3 (702)435-2121/ office (702)431-3807/ facsimile 4 Attorney for Plaintiff lcslaw@yahoo.com 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 ANDREW ARRAND, 8 CASE No. 2:20-cv-00694-BNW Plaintiff, 9 10 -vs.- 11 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY 12 Defendant. 13 ________________________________________ 14 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE A MOTION FOR 15 REVERSAL AND/OR REMAND (Second Request) 16 The Court filed and Order on December 18, 2020 regarding the filing of a Motion for 17 18 Reversal and/or Remand. The Motion is due from Plaintiff on Sunday, January 17, 2021 with 19 the following day being a holiday, Martin Luther King day. Based on the stipulation 20 hereinbelow, Plaintiff requests an additional (30) days to file his Motion. 21 FRCP 6(b) states: 22 (b)Extending Time: 23 (1) In General. When an act may or must be done within a specified time, the court may, for good cause, extend 24 the time: 25 (A) With or without motion or notice if the court acts, or if a request is made, before the original time or its extension expires; or 26 (B)On motion made after the time has expired if the party failed to act because of excusable neglect. 27 1 Local Rule 6-1 states: 2 (a) Every motion requesting a continuance, extension of time, or order shortening time shall 3 be “Filed” by the Clerk and processed as an expedited matter. Ex parte motions and stipulations shall be governed by LR 6-2. 4 (b) Every motion or stipulation to extend time shall inform the Court of any previous extensions granted and state the reasons for the extension requested. A request made after 5 the expiration of the specified period shall not be granted unless the moving party, 6 attorney, or other person demonstrates that the failure to act was the result of excusable neglect. Immediately below the title of such motion or stipulation there shall also be 7 included a statement indicating whether it is the first, second, third, etc., requested extension, i.e.: 8 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTIONS 9 (First Request) 10 (c) The Court may set aside any extension obtained in contravention of this Rule. 11 (d) A stipulation or motion seeking to extend the time to file an opposition or final reply to a motion, or to extend the time fixed for hearing a motion, must state in its opening 12 paragraph the filing date of the motion. 13 Local Rule 6-2 states: 14 (a) Any stipulations, ex parte or unopposed motions requesting a continuance, extension of 15 time, or order shortening time, and any other stipulation requiring an order shall not initially be “Filed” by the Clerk, but shall be marked “Received.” Every such stipulation 16 20 | Page or ex parte or unopposed motion shall include an “Order” in the form of a signature block on which the Court or Clerk can endorse approval of the relief sought. 17 This signature block shall not be on a separate page, but shall appear approximately one 18 inch (1”) below the last typewritten matter on the right-hand side of the last page of the stipulation or ex parte or unopposed motion, and shall read as follows: 19 “IT IS SO ORDERED: 20 [UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CLERK] 22 (whichever is appropriate) 23 DATED: _____________” 24 (b) Upon approval, amendment or denial, the stipulation or ex parte or unopposed motion shall be filed and processed by the Clerk in such manner as may be necessary. 25 26 27 The Ninth Circuit has held in Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc., 624 F.3d 1253, 1258-59 (9th 1 Cir. 2010) that Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1) “ ‘[is] to be liberally construed to effectuate the general 2 3 purpose of seeing that cases are tried on the merits.’ Rodgers v. Watt, 722 F.2d 456, 459 (9th 4 Cir.1983) (quoting Staren v. American Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago, 529 F.2d 1257, 1263 5 (7th Cir.1976)); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 1 (“[The Federal Rules] should be construed and 6 administered to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and 7 proceeding.”). Consequently, requests for extensions of time made before the applicable deadline 8 has passed should “normally ... be granted in the absence of bad faith on the part of the party 9 10 seeking relief or prejudice to the adverse party.” 4B Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. 11 Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1165 (3d ed. 2004).” Id. 12 Plaintiff’s counsel became ill the last week of 2020 and the first week of 2021. Plaintiff’s 13 counsel’s assistant had been exposed to Sars-Cov-2 and was sick as well. However, after testing, 14 her test came back negative as well as counsel for Plaintiff. Even so, this caused the need to 15 request additional time to respond. 16 / / / 17 18 / / / 19 / / / 20 / / / 21 / / / 22 / / / 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 26 / / / 27 THE PARTIES THEREFORE STIPULATE AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 2 1. That Plaintiff will have until February 16, 2021 to file his Motion for Reversal and/or 3 Remand. 4 |! Dated: January 28, 2021 Dated: January 28, 2021 > /s/ Louis Schneider, Esq. /s/ Allison J. Cheung, Esq. 6 || Louis Schneider, Esq. Allison J. Cheung, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9683 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 7 || 430 South 7® Street San Francisco, CA 94105-1545 Las Vegas, NV 89101 (415) 977-8942 office 8 || (702) 435-2121/ office (415) 744-0134 facsimile 9 (702) 431-3807/ facsimile Attorney for Defendant Attorney for Plaintiff 10 IT IS SO ORDERED: 1] 1 rls Ween 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE, 14 15 DATED: 2/8/2021 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Arrand v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arrand-v-commissioner-of-social-security-nvd-2021.