Arquette v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Arquette v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 128 Haw. 423
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided November 20, 2012·No. SCWC-11-0000416·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000416 20-NOV-2012 02:57 PM

SCWC-11-0000416

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

ALDEN JAMES ARQUETTE,

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellee,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAI#I, STEPHEN H. LEVINS, and MICHAEL J.S. MORIYAMA, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0000416; CIV. NO. 08-1-0118)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Nakayama, Acting C.J., Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ., and Circuit Judge Crandall, in place of Recktenwald, C.J., recused)

The Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on October

9, 2012 by Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellee Alden

James Arquette is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be

heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 20, 2012.

Eric A. Seitz, /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Della Au Belatti, and Ronald N.W. Kim, /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. for petitioner /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

Dennis K. Ferm, for respondent /s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Virginia L. Crandall

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arquette v. State, (haw 2012).

Arquette v. State (Arquette v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.