Arpino Vs. The First Jud. Dist. Ct.

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided May 7, 2020·No. 80474·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JOHN FRANCIS ARPINO, No. 80474 Petitioner, vs.

79 r

THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT ti L.7;

i ,

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MAY 0 7 2020 CARSON CITY,

77:0'1IN

Res s ondent.

A-1-3/

CrL

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

This pro se petition was docketed in this court on January 24, 2020, without payment of the requisite filing fee. On March 2, 2020, this court issued an order directing petitioner to pay the filing fee or file an affidavit demonstrating his inability to pay within 30 days. The order cautioned petitioner that failure to comply "will result in the dismissal of this petition." To date, petitioner has not complied. Accordingly, cause appearing, this petition is dismissed.

It is so ORDERED.1

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETI-I A. BROWN

jtilatt-

BY A /t/trvvvviA?

cc: John Francis Arpino Attorney General/Carson City Carson City Clerk

SUPREME COURT 1 This order renders moot petitioner's January 24, 2020, motion to OF NEVADA extend prison copy work limit.

CLERK'S ORDER

101-1447

o - 7'II3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arpino Vs. The First Jud. Dist. Ct., (Neb. 2020).

Arpino Vs. The First Jud. Dist. Ct. (Arpino Vs. The First Jud. Dist. Ct.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.