Arpino (John) Vs. Warden
This text of Arpino (John) Vs. Warden (Arpino (John) Vs. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JOHN FRANCIS ARPINO, No. 79347 Appellant, VS.
ISIDRO BACA, WARDEN; AND JAMES FILED DZURENDA, NDOC DIRECTOR Respondents. EL H A. BROWN CLE ,UPREME COU BY CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a "motion for NRCP Rule 60(b) 1, 3, 4 relief." First Judicial District Court, Carson City; James Todd Russell, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion for NRCP 60(b) relief in a criminal matter, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
I XL4,1,\ , J. Hardesty
Silver
cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge John Francis Arpino Attorney General/Carson City Carson City Clerk
/ 313 a
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Arpino (John) Vs. Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arpino-john-vs-warden-nev-2019.