Arpin v. Consol. Rail Co.
2017 Ohio 644, 69 N.E.3d 752, 148 Ohio St. 3d 1414
Opinion
Cuyahoga App. No. 104279, 2016-Ohio-8313. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.
Upon consideration of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Dan Himmelfarb, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arpin v. Consol. Rail Co., 2017 Ohio 644, 69 N.E.3d 752, 148 Ohio St. 3d 1414 (Ohio 2017).
2017 Ohio 644 (Arpin v. Consol. Rail Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.