Arpin Construction Co. v. Napoleon B. Broward Drainage District

114 So. 383, 94 Fla. 634
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 12, 1927·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel *635 for the respective parties, and the record' having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it -seems to the Court that there is‘no error in the said judgment'; if is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arpin Construction Co. v. Napoleon B. Broward Drainage District, 114 So. 383, 94 Fla. 634 (Fla. 1927).

114 So. 383 (Arpin Construction Co. v. Napoleon B. Broward Drainage District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.