Arp v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Arp v. State

70 S.W.2d 997, 126 Tex. Crim. 229, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 605

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 3, 1934

DocketNo. 16190.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 70 S.W.2d 997 (Arp v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arp v. State, 70 S.W.2d 997, 126 Tex. Crim. 229, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 605 (Tex. 1934).

Pincite

Opinions

The offense is theft of cattle; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

It is recited in the transcript that appellant entered into recognizance after notice of appeal was given. The recognizance is not brought forward in the transcript. When the accused is enlarged, this court is without jurisdiction in the absence of a proper recognizance or appeal bond. Hudgins v. State,36 S.W.2d 488.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

ON REINSTATEMENT OF APPEAL.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI