Arp v. Parkdale Mills, Inc.
576 S.E.2d 326, 356 N.C. 657, 2003 N.C. LEXIS 36
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 28, 2003
DocketNo. 311A02
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases
This text of 576 S.E.2d 326 (Arp v. Parkdale Mills, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Arp v. Parkdale Mills, Inc., 576 S.E.2d 326, 356 N.C. 657, 2003 N.C. LEXIS 36 (N.C. 2003).
Opinion
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the North Carolina Industrial Commission for proceedings not inconsistent with the dissenting opinion.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Weaver v. Dedmon
801 S.E.2d 131 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2017)
Watts v. Borg Warner Automotive, Inc.
613 S.E.2d 715 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
Halsey v. Hearthstone Enter.
North Carolina Industrial Commission, 2005
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
576 S.E.2d 326, 356 N.C. 657, 2003 N.C. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arp-v-parkdale-mills-inc-nc-2003.