Arp v. Parkdale Mills, Inc.
576 S.E.2d 326, 356 N.C. 657, 2003 N.C. LEXIS 36
Opinion
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the North Carolina Industrial Commission for proceedings not inconsistent with the dissenting opinion.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arp v. Parkdale Mills, Inc., 576 S.E.2d 326, 356 N.C. 657, 2003 N.C. LEXIS 36 (N.C. 2003).
576 S.E.2d 326 (Arp v. Parkdale Mills, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Weaver v. Dedmon
801 S.E.2d 131 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2017)
Watts v. Borg Warner Automotive, Inc.
613 S.E.2d 715 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
Halsey v. Hearthstone Enter.
North Carolina Industrial Commission, 2005