Arowesty v. Weissman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Arowesty v. Weissman

203 A.D.2d 220, 612 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3182

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 4, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 203 A.D.2d 220 (Arowesty v. Weissman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arowesty v. Weissman, 203 A.D.2d 220, 612 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3182 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for negligence in which the plaintiff’s attorney asserts a charging lien over a recovery fund, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), dated July 23, 1992, as granted her motion to produce certain documents only to the extent of directing the plaintiff’s counsel to provide the plaintiff with copies of any papers not produced to date which addressed the [221]*221preparation, prosecution, or settlement of the negligence action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The court properly limited discovery to those materials relevant to a determination of the services rendered in creating the recovery fund (see, CPLR 3101 [a]). Sullivan, J. P., Lawrence, Pizzuto, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for negligence in which the plaintiff’s attorney asserts a charging lien over a recovery fund, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), dated July 23, 1992, as granted her motion to produce certain documents only to the extent of directing the plaintiff’s counsel to provide the plaintiff with copies of any papers not produced to date which addressed the [221]*221preparation, prosecution, or settlement of the negligence action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The court properly limited discovery to those materials relevant to a determination of the services rendered in creating the recovery fund (see, CPLR 3101 [a]). Sullivan, J. P., Lawrence, Pizzuto, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

203 A.D.2d 220, 612 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arowesty-v-weissman-nyappdiv-1994.