Arotsky v. Kropnitsky
127 A. 923, 101 N.J.L. 203, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 199
This text of 127 A. 923 (Arotsky v. Kropnitsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Arotsky v. Kropnitsky, 127 A. 923, 101 N.J.L. 203, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 199 (N.J. 1925).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Teen-chard, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Infante v. Gottesman
558 A.2d 1338 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1989)
A. CRESCI & SON, INC. v. Steiker
72 A.2d 222 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
127 A. 923, 101 N.J.L. 203, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arotsky-v-kropnitsky-nj-1925.