Aronson v. Sweeney
162 P. 35, 94 Wash. 698, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 1283
Opinion
This case involves a lease for a saloon and wholesale liquor store, and involves in general the same propositions as were considered in the case of The Stratford v. Seattle Brewing & Malting Co., ante p. 125, 162 Pac. 31. For the reasons there discussed and determined, the same result is reached herein.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Aronson v. Sweeney, 162 P. 35, 94 Wash. 698, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 1283 (Wash. 1916).
162 P. 35 (Aronson v. Sweeney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Feinberg
253 A.2d 636 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1969)
State v. Carlsten
136 P.2d 183 (Washington Supreme Court, 1943)
State v. Bogdon
248 P. 66 (Washington Supreme Court, 1926)
Hamilton v. State
133 N.E. 491 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1922)
Shepard v. Sullivan
162 P. 34 (Washington Supreme Court, 1916)