Aronson v. Salomon Bros.
436 N.E.2d 193, 56 N.Y.2d 642, 450 N.Y.S.2d 787, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3307
Opinion
[643]*643Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the order which pertains to defendants Salomon Brothers Holding Company and Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Company, dismissed upon the ground that said portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion otherwise denied with $20 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Aronson v. Salomon Bros., 436 N.E.2d 193, 56 N.Y.2d 642, 450 N.Y.S.2d 787, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3307 (N.Y. 1982).
436 N.E.2d 193 (Aronson v. Salomon Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jackson v. County of Nassau
339 F. Supp. 2d 473 (E.D. New York, 2004)