Aronson Company v. Elizabeth Pearson

California Supreme Court

Aronson Company v. Elizabeth Pearson

249 P. 191, 199 Cal. 781, 1926 Cal. LEXIS 328

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 29, 1926

DocketDocket No. L.A. 8591.

StatusPublished

This text of 249 P. 191 (Aronson Company v. Elizabeth Pearson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aronson Company v. Elizabeth Pearson, 249 P. 191, 199 Cal. 781, 1926 Cal. LEXIS 328 (Cal. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order granting defendant's motion to discharge an attachment. The facts leading up to the issuance of the attachment are stated in the opinion this day filed in the same action on the defendant's appeal from a prior order denying her motion to discharge the same attachment. (Aronson Co. v. Pearson, ante, p. 286 [249 P. 188].) At a time subsequent to the denial of such motion, the defendant again moved the court to discharge the attachment, basing her motion upon the grounds stated in her first motion, and the court thereupon made the order from which this appeal is taken. Upon the grounds stated in the said opinion, the order appealed from herein is reversed.

Rehearing denied.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order granting defendant's motion to discharge an attachment. The facts leading up to the issuance of the attachment are stated in the opinion this day filed in the same action on the defendant's appeal from a prior order denying her motion to discharge the same attachment. (Aronson Co. v. Pearson, ante, p. 286 [249 P. 188].) At a time subsequent to the denial of such motion, the defendant again moved the court to discharge the attachment, basing her motion upon the grounds stated in her first motion, and the court thereupon made the order from which this appeal is taken. Upon the grounds stated in the said opinion, the order appealed from herein is reversed.

Rehearing denied.

*Page 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 P. 191, 199 Cal. 781, 1926 Cal. LEXIS 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aronson-company-v-elizabeth-pearson-cal-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack