Home/New York Court of Appeals/Aronsky v. Board of Education

Aronsky v. Board of Education

582 N.E.2d 595, 78 N.Y.2d 1057, 576 N.Y.S.2d 212, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4710
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Aronsky v. Board of Education. Read the opinion of the Court — 75 N.Y.2d 997 →
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 17, 1991·Published

Opinion

Motion, treated as a motion to extend the time to move to amend remittitur, granted; motion to amend remittitur granted, remittitur recalled and, when returned, it will be amended to read as follows:

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), judgment, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with costs, particular "F” of the charges against petitioner dismissed as time barred, and the matter remitted to Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein. [See, 75 NY2d 997.]

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aronsky v. Board of Education, 582 N.E.2d 595, 78 N.Y.2d 1057, 576 N.Y.S.2d 212, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4710 (N.Y. 1991).

582 N.E.2d 595 (Aronsky v. Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.