Aronsky v. Board of Education

New York Court of Appeals

Aronsky v. Board of Education

582 N.E.2d 595, 78 N.Y.2d 1057, 576 N.Y.S.2d 212, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4710

DecidedOctober 17, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 582 N.E.2d 595 (Aronsky v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aronsky v. Board of Education, 582 N.E.2d 595, 78 N.Y.2d 1057, 576 N.Y.S.2d 212, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4710 (N.Y. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion, treated as a motion to extend the time to move to amend remittitur, granted; motion to amend remittitur granted, remittitur recalled and, when returned, it will be amended to read as follows:

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), judgment, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with costs, particular "F” of the charges against petitioner dismissed as time barred, and the matter remitted to Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein. [See, 75 NY2d 997.]

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, treated as a motion to extend the time to move to amend remittitur, granted; motion to amend remittitur granted, remittitur recalled and, when returned, it will be amended to read as follows:

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), judgment, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with costs, particular "F” of the charges against petitioner dismissed as time barred, and the matter remitted to Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein. [See, 75 NY2d 997.]

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

582 N.E.2d 595, 78 N.Y.2d 1057, 576 N.Y.S.2d 212, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aronsky-v-board-of-education-ny-1991.