Aronne v. Aronne

275 A.D.2d 755, 714 N.Y.S.2d 231, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9404
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 25, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Beldock, J.H.O.), entered December 8, 1998, as, after a non-jury trial, equitably distributed certain of the marital assets of the parties.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in the equitable distribution of certain of the marital assets (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [1] [c], [d]; Miller v Miller, 128 AD2d 844; Majauskas v Majauskas, 61 NY2d 481; Wiercinski v Wiercinski, 116 AD2d 789). Florio, J. P., Luciano, Feuerstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aronne v. Aronne, 275 A.D.2d 755, 714 N.Y.S.2d 231, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9404 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

275 A.D.2d 755 (Aronne v. Aronne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meza v. Meza
294 A.D.2d 414 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)