Aronin v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Aronin v. United States

30 Cust. Ct. 375, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 169

United States Customs Court·Decided March 12, 1953·No. No. 57139; protests 154703-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates (except as to the merchandise described as 14 kid neck plates in ease 424, entered under warehouse bond 41518, covered by protest 927926-G) are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Rung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained. In all other respects the protests were overruled.

Ford, J., concurred. Mollison, J., dissented for the resaons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates (except as to the merchandise described as 14 kid neck plates in ease 424, entered under warehouse bond 41518, covered by protest 927926-G) are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Rung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained. In all other respects the protests were overruled.

Ford, J., concurred. Mollison, J., dissented for the resaons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, supra.

Aronin v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 375, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 169 (cusc 1953).

Pincite

30 Cust. Ct. 375 (Aronin v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related