Aroneck v. Atkin
78 A.D.2d 980, 435 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13747
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Aroneck v. Atkin. Read the opinion of the Court — 90 A.D.2d 966 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 1980·Published
Opinions
— Order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We affirm because plaintiffs have not demonstrated that they have an interest in the litigation; nor have they made a showing of special or extraordinary circumstances (Gardner v Fyr-Fyter Co., 55 AD2d 816). All concur, except Callahan, J., who dissents and votes to reverse the order and grant the motion, in the following memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Aroneck v. Atkin, 78 A.D.2d 980, 435 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).
78 A.D.2d 980 (Aroneck v. Atkin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gardner v. Fyr-Fyter Co.
55 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Frank Fahey v. County of Ontario
55 A.D.2d 1034 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)