Aroneck v. Atkin

78 A.D.2d 980, 435 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13747
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Aroneck v. Atkin. Read the opinion of the Court — 90 A.D.2d 966

Opinions

— Order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We affirm because plaintiffs have not demonstrated that they have an interest in the litigation; nor have they made a showing of special or extraordinary circumstances (Gardner v Fyr-Fyter Co., 55 AD2d 816). All concur, except Callahan, J., who dissents and votes to reverse the order and grant the motion, in the following memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aroneck v. Atkin, 78 A.D.2d 980, 435 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

78 A.D.2d 980 (Aroneck v. Atkin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gardner v. Fyr-Fyter Co.
55 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Frank Fahey v. County of Ontario
55 A.D.2d 1034 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)