Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Aroneck v. Atkin

Aroneck v. Atkin

78 A.D.2d 980, 435 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13747
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 13, 1980
StatusPublished

This text of 78 A.D.2d 980 (Aroneck v. Atkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aroneck v. Atkin, 78 A.D.2d 980, 435 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinions

— Order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We affirm because plaintiffs have not demonstrated that they have an interest in the litigation; nor have they made a showing of special or extraordinary circumstances (Gardner v Fyr-Fyter Co., 55 AD2d 816). All concur, except Callahan, J., who dissents and votes to reverse the order and grant the motion, in the following memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gardner v. Fyr-Fyter Co.
55 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Frank Fahey v. County of Ontario
55 A.D.2d 1034 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 A.D.2d 980, 435 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aroneck-v-atkin-nyappdiv-1980.