Aro v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Aro v. State

208 So. 3d 382, 2016 La. LEXIS 2321

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 7, 2016·No. NO. 2016-KH-0680·Published

Opinion

Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court Divs. H, I, D, Nos. 15-F-001199, 14-F-002826,14-F-002904;

| WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the “extraordinary circumstances” that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct. Rule X § 5(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court Divs. H, I, D, Nos. 15-F-001199, 14-F-002826,14-F-002904;

| WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the “extraordinary circumstances” that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct. Rule X § 5(b).

Aro v. State, 208 So. 3d 382, 2016 La. LEXIS 2321 (La. 2016).

Pincite

208 So. 3d 382 (Aro v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.