Aro v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Aro v. State

208 So. 3d 382, 2016 La. LEXIS 2321

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 7, 2016

DocketNO. 2016-KH-0680

StatusPublished

This text of 208 So. 3d 382 (Aro v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aro v. State, 208 So. 3d 382, 2016 La. LEXIS 2321 (La. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court Divs. H, I, D, Nos. 15-F-001199, 14-F-002826,14-F-002904;

| WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the “extraordinary circumstances” that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct. Rule X § 5(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court Divs. H, I, D, Nos. 15-F-001199, 14-F-002826,14-F-002904;

| WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the “extraordinary circumstances” that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct. Rule X § 5(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 So. 3d 382, 2016 La. LEXIS 2321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aro-v-state-la-2016.