ARNULFO RAMIREZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of ARNULFO RAMIREZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA (ARNULFO RAMIREZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
ARNULFO RAMIREZ, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D17-2104
[October 18, 2017]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Dan L. Vaughn, Judge; L.T. Case No. 47-2007-CF-000934-A.
Arnulfo Ramirez, Florida City, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek any relief available with the Department of Corrections regarding enforcement of the 2008 sentencing order, and after exhaustion of administrative remedies, to seek mandamus relief in the circuit court if appropriate. Cooper v. State, 186 So. 3d 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).
CIKLIN, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ARNULFO RAMIREZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnulfo-ramirez-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2017.