Arntz Contracting Company, Beacon Construction Company, K.A. Construction Co., and Teaco, Inc., a Joint Venture v. The United States

769 F.2d 770
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedAugust 15, 1985
Docket85-619
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 769 F.2d 770 (Arntz Contracting Company, Beacon Construction Company, K.A. Construction Co., and Teaco, Inc., a Joint Venture v. The United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arntz Contracting Company, Beacon Construction Company, K.A. Construction Co., and Teaco, Inc., a Joint Venture v. The United States, 769 F.2d 770 (Fed. Cir. 1985).

Opinion

769 F.2d 770

ARNTZ CONTRACTING COMPANY, Beacon Construction Company, K.A.
Construction Co., and Teaco, Inc., a joint
venture, Appellants,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Appellee.

Appeal No. 85-619.

United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.

Aug. 15, 1985.

Appealed from Energy Board of Contract Appeals.

John W. Rosenberg, Riede, Rosenberg, McCall & Cahill, San Rafael, Cal., argued for appellants.

Alvin A. Schall, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued for appellee. With him on the brief were Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Thomas W. Petersen, Asst. Director.

Paul W. Lewis, Office of the Gen. Counsel, U.S. Dept. of Energy, of Washington, D.C., of counsel.

Before KASHIWA, NEWMAN, and BISSELL, Circuit Judges.

KASHIWA, Circuit Judge.

Arntz Contracting Company, Beacon Construction Company, K.A. Construction Company, and Teaco, Inc., a joint venture (hereinafter Arntz), appeals the decision of the Department of Energy Board of Contract Appeals (Board), No. 187-12-81, 84-3 BCA p 17,604 (1984), in which it held that it had jurisdiction of the appeal under the Contracts Disputes Act of 1978, and in which it denied Arntz any recovery on its claims.

Having fully considered the record and the submissions of the parties, we affirm the Board's decision on the basis of its thorough and well-reasoned opinion.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Facilities Systems Engineering Corp. v. United States
38 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,315 (Court of Claims, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
769 F.2d 770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arntz-contracting-company-beacon-construction-company-ka-construction-cafc-1985.