Arnstein v. Engelhardt
This text of 272 A.D.2d 1033 (Arnstein v. Engelhardt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, insofar as it denies the' application of the student petitioners, affirmed. Carswell, Johnston and Sneed, JJ., concur; Hag-arty, Acting P. J., and Adel, J., dissent and vote to reverse that part of the order and to grant the application of the student petitioners. Order, insofar as it grants the application of the nonstudent petitioners, affirmed. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Adel and Sneed,. JJ., concur; Carswell* and Johnston, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse that part of the order and to deny the application of the non-[1034]*1034student petitioners. Insofar as the order directs the Board of Elections to convene and register those petitioners qualified to be registered as voters, it is affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Motions for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur. [189 Misc. 1020.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
272 A.D.2d 1033, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnstein-v-engelhardt-nyappdiv-1947.