Arnstein v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

248 A.D. 888, 291 N.Y.S. 158, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7947

Opinion

In a stockholder’s derivative action, the motion of defendant Jennings for an order directing plaintiff to serve an amended com[889]*889plaint separately stating and numbering the alleged causes of action was denied. Order, in so far as an appeal is taken therefrom, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to appellant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arnstein v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 248 A.D. 888, 291 N.Y.S. 158, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7947 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

248 A.D. 888 (Arnstein v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.