Arnott v. Nicholls

1 H. & J. 471
General Court of Virginia·Decided April 15, 1804·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Chase, Ch. J.

The return toth o, her i fiadas, must-be quashed, so far as it respects the land sold and conveyed by the defendant to' Thomas Goldsborough, no-fraud or collusion in the sale to him having been alleged.

The terre-tenant should have an opportunity to relieve himself, and to bring in the other terre-fenants —-Hence the. necessity of a scire facias, that all the terre-tenants may be warned.

On this motion as much may be brought out as in an action of ejectment, and more, as the court have an equitable control*

RetueN quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arnott v. Nicholls, 1 H. & J. 471 (Va. Super. Ct. 1804).

1 H. & J. 471 (Arnott v. Nicholls) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniels v. Solomon
11 App. D.C. 163 (D.C. Circuit, 1897)
Warfield ex rel. Manro v. Brewer
4 Gill 265 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1846)
Mandeville v. McDonald
16 F. Cas. 589 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1829)