Arnott v. Arnott
128 Ohio St. 3d 1410, 2011 WL 710876
This text of 128 Ohio St. 3d 1410 (Arnott v. Arnott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Arnott v. Arnott, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1410, 2011 WL 710876 (Ohio 2011).
Opinion
Highland App. No. 09CA25, 2010-Ohio-5392. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Entry filed December 10, 2010:
“What is the proper standard for appellate review of purely legal issues that must be resolved after the trial court has decided a complaint for declaratory judgment presents a justiciable question under Revised Code Chapter 2721, i.e., must an appellate court afford deference to a trial court's interpretation or application of the law?”
The conflict case is Maxwell v. Fry, Butler App. No. CA2007-11-284, 2009-Ohio-1650.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Arnott v. Arnott
2010 Ohio 5392 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2010)
Maxwell v. Fry, Ca2007-11-284 (4-6-2009)
2009 Ohio 1650 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
128 Ohio St. 3d 1410, 2011 WL 710876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnott-v-arnott-ohio-2011.