Arnote v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Arnote v. State

1930 OK CR 291, 292 P. 1118, 49 Okla. Crim. 108, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 207

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 14, 1930

DocketN. A-7366.

StatusPublished

This text of 1930 OK CR 291 (Arnote v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arnote v. State, 1930 OK CR 291, 292 P. 1118, 49 Okla. Crim. 108, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 207 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Garfield county on a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor and was sentenced to pay a fine of $300 and to serve 90 days in the county jail.

The case was tried in January, 1929, and the appeal was lodged in this court in May, 1929. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed, nor was there any appearance for oral argument at the time the case was submitted.

We have examined the record. There is sufficient evidence from which the jury might reasonably and logically find the defendant guilty. No material error is apparent.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Garfield county on a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor and was sentenced to pay a fine of $300 and to serve 90 days in the county jail.

The case was tried in January, 1929, and the appeal was lodged in this court in May, 1929. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed, nor was there any appearance for oral argument at the time the case was submitted.

We have examined the record. There is sufficient evidence from which the jury might reasonably and logically find the defendant guilty. No material error is apparent.

The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1930 OK CR 291, 292 P. 1118, 49 Okla. Crim. 108, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnote-v-state-oklacrimapp-1930.