Arnot v. Arnot

Montana Supreme Court

Arnot v. Arnot

27 P.2d 1116, 94 Mont. 611, 1933 Mont. LEXIS 99

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedJune 1, 1933

DocketNo. 7,064.

StatusPublished

This text of 27 P.2d 1116 (Arnot v. Arnot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arnot v. Arnot, 27 P.2d 1116, 94 Mont. 611, 1933 Mont. LEXIS 99 (Mo. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to stipulation of counsel for appellant and counsel for respondent filed this day, it is ordered that the decree of settlement of the current account of appellant guardian made and given in the district court of the seventeenth judicial district, in and for the county of Valley, on the sixth day of July, 1932, be vacated and set aside, and the cause is remanded to the district court of Pondera county, Montana, to which the cause has been transferred, for such further proceedings as that court may deem advisable.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to stipulation of counsel for appellant and counsel for respondent filed this day, it is ordered that the decree of settlement of the current account of appellant guardian made and given in the district court of the seventeenth judicial district, in and for the county of Valley, on the sixth day of July, 1932, be vacated and set aside, and the cause is remanded to the district court of Pondera county, Montana, to which the cause has been transferred, for such further proceedings as that court may deem advisable.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 P.2d 1116, 94 Mont. 611, 1933 Mont. LEXIS 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnot-v-arnot-mont-1933.