Arnone v. Scott

S.D. New York

Arnone v. Scott

DecidedAugust 2, 2021

Docket1:20-cv-09683

StatusUnknown

This text of Arnone v. Scott (Arnone v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arnone v. Scott, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: Saracen cscs ncaa nnn □□□ DATE FILED:__ 8/2/2021 ROBERTA ARNONE, aka THE NEIGHBORLY : NOTARY and NEIGHBORLY NOTARY, INC.,a New: York Corporation, : : 20-cv-9683 (LJL) Plaintiffs, : : ORDER -V- : ROXANNE SCOTT and THE NEIGHBORLY : NOTARY, LLC, an Ohio Registered Limited Liability : Corporation, d/b/a THE NEIGHBORLY NOTARY, : Defendants. :

LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: Parties are directed to appear for a telephonic conference on August 9, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. Parties are directed to dial (888) 251-2909 and use access code 2123101. Because the parties have asked the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce their agreement, the settlement is a judicial document and therefore subject to a presumption of public access under Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The parties have not identified any factors that would overcome the presumption of access. See In re Sept. 11] Litig., 723 F. Supp. 2d 526, 532-33 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (unsealing settlement documents because “the final settlement would be subject to ‘a proceeding in open court, and the document sought to be acted upon by the judicial power ... must become a public record.’”) (quoting United States v. Glens Falls Newspapers, Inc., 160 F.3d 853, 867-57 (2d Cir. 1998)); see also Mercer Health & Benefits LLC v. DiGregorio, 2018 WL 3559165, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. July 13, 2018) (directing the parties to file their settlement agreement on the public docket with only redactions for “client lists and any other information for which the parties can make a compelling showing of the need for confidentiality”). Parties should be prepared to discuss the effect of these decisions on the Court’s authority to retain jurisdiction to enforce the agreement. SO ORDERED. a Yo Dated: August 2, 2021 tl ME nes New York, New York LEWIS J. LIMAN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: Saracen cscs ncaa nnn □□□ DATE FILED:__ 8/2/2021 ROBERTA ARNONE, aka THE NEIGHBORLY : NOTARY and NEIGHBORLY NOTARY, INC.,a New: York Corporation, : : 20-cv-9683 (LJL) Plaintiffs, : : ORDER -V- : ROXANNE SCOTT and THE NEIGHBORLY : NOTARY, LLC, an Ohio Registered Limited Liability : Corporation, d/b/a THE NEIGHBORLY NOTARY, : Defendants. :

LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: Parties are directed to appear for a telephonic conference on August 9, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. Parties are directed to dial (888) 251-2909 and use access code 2123101. Because the parties have asked the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce their agreement, the settlement is a judicial document and therefore subject to a presumption of public access under Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The parties have not identified any factors that would overcome the presumption of access. See In re Sept. 11] Litig., 723 F. Supp. 2d 526, 532-33 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (unsealing settlement documents because “the final settlement would be subject to ‘a proceeding in open court, and the document sought to be acted upon by the judicial power ... must become a public record.’”) (quoting United States v. Glens Falls Newspapers, Inc., 160 F.3d 853, 867-57 (2d Cir. 1998)); see also Mercer Health & Benefits LLC v. DiGregorio, 2018 WL 3559165, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. July 13, 2018) (directing the parties to file their settlement agreement on the public docket with only redactions for “client lists and any other information for which the parties can make a compelling showing of the need for confidentiality”). Parties should be prepared to discuss the effect of these decisions on the Court’s authority to retain jurisdiction to enforce the agreement. SO ORDERED. a Yo Dated: August 2, 2021 tl ME nes New York, New York LEWIS J. LIMAN United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Arnone v. Scott, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnone-v-scott-nysd-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack